---
tags: vtaiwan
---
# vTaiwan in Facing the Ocean 2025
日期 Date：2025/9/13, 14
時間 Time ：9/13-9:30 - 20:00, 9/14-9:30-12:30
地點 Location ：
參與者 Participants：Bestian,Peter,Anan阿南,Tim,Tofus
https://www.vtaiwan.tw/jitsi
(請用Google登入以參與視訊並啟用轉錄功能)
- 提案簡報 Presentation: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1-TRkdhn1ngJ0NhPdOWhiKUhaHvd9C9_3L7YlgExu71A/edit?usp=sharing

## Sensemaker Testing
- 我們的目標：希望邀請使用者一起來玩玩看 sensemaker，一起來測試用 AI 分析大規模的意見是否準確，並且看看可以應用在哪些場景之中。
- Our goal: We would like to invite users to try out Sensemaker, to test whether AI can accurately analyze large-scale opinions, and to explore in which scenarios it can be applied.
- 私たちの目標：ユーザーの皆さんにSensemakerを試していただき、AIで大規模な意見を正確に分析できるかを検証し、さらにどのような場面で応用できるかを一緒に探りたいと考えています。
- 우리의 목표: 사용자들이 Sensemaker를 직접 사용해 보고, AI가 대규모 의견을 얼마나 정확하게 분석할 수 있는지 시험하며, 어떤 상황에 적용할 수 있는지 함께 살펴보고자 합니다.
- 不能編輯 hackmd? 沒關係，歡迎來這個 [google doc 工作區](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jSoJy8bwp9gNKJNtqv1JNnNvKSfsfv_eYuvGZ4aT8HM/edit?usp=sharing)協作
- Can’t edit HackMD? No problem, feel free to join this [Google Doc workspace](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jSoJy8bwp9gNKJNtqv1JNnNvKSfsfv_eYuvGZ4aT8HM/edit?usp=sharing) for collaboration.
- HackMDを編集できませんか？大丈夫です。この[Googleドキュメント作業スペース](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jSoJy8bwp9gNKJNtqv1JNnNvKSfsfv_eYuvGZ4aT8HM/edit?usp=sharing)での共同作業にぜひご参加ください。
- HackMD를 편집할 수 없나요? 괜찮습니다. 이 [Google](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jSoJy8bwp9gNKJNtqv1JNnNvKSfsfv_eYuvGZ4aT8HM/edit?usp=sharing) 문서 작업 공간에서 함께 협업해 주세요.
- 請參考以下的使用說明，一起來玩玩看！
- Please refer to the following instructions and give it a try!
- 以下の使用説明を参考にして、一緒に試してみましょう！
- 아래 사용 설명을 참고하시고, 함께 해봐요!
- [SenseMaker使用說明 Instruction V2](https://g0v.hackmd.io/vjYMEjYqRmGfYc0hScQkWg?view)

# 歷史案例研究 Historical Case Study

[詳細說明/For Detail](https://hackmd.io/Os5_JBm_RPiWBnZ8v9EpFQ?view)

### Reports

* [SenseMaker報告-Uber爭議-華文](https://hackmd.io/-EpjEA0dQ3-nNspbxymaSg?view)
* [SenseMaker Report - Uber Controversy - English](https://hackmd.io/TV29KodMRE-HFtXfDYTyVg?view)

---

## Uber 議題透過 Pol.is + vTaiwan 處理的過程

## Process of Handling the Uber Issue through Pol.is + vTaiwan

| **步驟 / Step** | **中文 / Madarin** | **English** |
| ---------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **議題啟動 / Issue Launch** | 約在 2015 年，Uber 的運營模式與合法性問題在臺灣引起爭議。政府受到社會壓力，要處理新型載客服務模式的法規調整問題。vTaiwan 將 Uber 納入首批「共享經濟 / 新型交通服務」檢討案件。([compdemocracy.org][3]) | Around 2015, Uber’s business model and legality became a hot issue in Taiwan. The government faced public pressure to address regulatory gaps for these emerging ride-hailing services. vTaiwan identified Uber as one of the first cases under the “sharing economy/new transportation services” category. ([compdemocracy.org][3]) |
| **線上民意徵集 / Online Public Input via Pol.is** | vTaiwan 團隊進行為期四週的 Pol.is 線上互動，開放乘客、Uber 駕駛、計程車駕駛與其他相關利害人參與討論 UberX 模式。([blog.pol.is][4]) | The vTaiwan team conducted a four-week Pol.is interaction, allowing passengers, Uber drivers, taxi drivers, and other stakeholders to share views on the UberX model. ([blog.pol.is][4]) |
| **討論群組與意見樣態 / Discussion Clusters** | Pol.is 顯示四大群體：計程車司機、Uber 駕駛、Uber 乘客、其他乘客。每個群體在主要議題上意見分歧，透過贊成/反對票與互動視覺化呈現。([Pugs][5]) | Pol.is identified four main clusters: taxi drivers, Uber drivers, Uber passengers, and other passengers. These groups held divergent opinions, visualized through agree/disagree voting. ([Pugs][5]) |
| **從分歧到共識 / Moving from Division to Consensus** | 雖然起初分歧嚴重，但出現共通點：Uber 駕駛願考職業駕照、繳稅；乘客希望便利但也要求安全；計程車業者與 Uber 平台有潛在合作空間。這些共通點成為後續會議焦點。([Pugs][5]) | Despite initial divisions, overlaps emerged: Uber drivers were willing to get professional licenses and pay taxes; passengers wanted convenience with safety; taxi operators and Uber had room for cooperation. These shared points became the focus of later meetings. ([Pugs][5]) |
| **政策建議與法規修訂 / Policy Recommendations and Legal Revisions** | 政府基於 Pol.is 與後續會議進行跨部會協調。Uber 承諾鼓勵駕駛依法取得資格並繳納稅費。最終政府修訂法規，例如在《汽車運輸業管理規則》增加「Uber條款」，明確規範租賃車、共乘服務與計程車相關條件。([congress.crowd.law][6]) | Based on Pol.is results and subsequent meetings, the government coordinated across agencies. Uber agreed to promote driver licensing and tax compliance. Eventually, regulations were revised, including a specific “Uber clause” in transportation laws to define rental cars, ride-sharing, and taxi-related rules. ([congress.crowd.law][6]) |

---

# Opinion Gathering

---

[1]: https://news.pts.org.tw/article/340926?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Uber爭議多唐鳳:現行法規確實缺乏規範"
[2]: https://www.twreporter.org/a/open-government?utm_source=chatgpt.com "開放政府，玩真的嗎？"
[3]: https://compdemocracy.org/case-studies/2014-vtaiwan/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "vTaiwan"
[4]: https://blog.pol.is/uber-responds-to-vtaiwans-coherent-blended-volition-3e9b75102b9b?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Uber responds to vTaiwan's coherent blended volition |"
[5]: https://pugs.blogs.com/audrey/2015/10/vtaiwan-uberx.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Uber 回應vTaiwan 的融貫綜合意向- 鳳 - Pugs"
[6]: https://congress.crowd.law/case-vtaiwan.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com "vTaiwan - Crowdlaw for Congress"
[7]: https://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/201610310344.aspx?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Uber條款將上路11月高層來台見唐鳳"
___