---
tags: vtaiwan,dpsurvey
---
# FTO Collaborative Note
## What we want to do?
- Using survey, interview, test with events, we want to know the digital tools used for civic participation around the world. What is the advantage and disadvantage of them, and how to use them in the real event.
- アンケート、インタビュー、イベントでのテストを通じて、世界中で市民参加のために使用されているデジタルツールを調査したいと考えています。それらのツールの利点と欠点、そして実際のイベントでそれらをどのように活用できるかを知りたいです。
- 설문조사, 인터뷰, 이벤트에서의 테스트를 통해 전 세계에서 시민 참여를 위해 사용되는 디지털 도구들을 조사하고자 합니다. 이러한 도구들의 장단점은 무엇이며, 실제 이벤트에서 어떻게 활용할 수 있을지 알고 싶습니다.

## Our Goal
- We want to create a website to introduce the tools, the use cases, and the analysis for civic tech projects, NGO, or even government agency.
- 市民技術プロジェクト、NGO、または政府機関向けに、ツールの紹介、使用事例、および分析を提供するウェブサイトを作成したいと考えています。
- 시빅 테크 프로젝트, NGO, 또는 정부 기관을 위해 도구, 사용 사례 및 분석을 소개하는 웹사이트를 만들고자 합니다.

## What do we have now?
- We have already collect some use cases and tools from all over the world. We are now looking for people who have used the tools in Japan and Korea.
- 私たちはすでに世界中からいくつかの使用事例とツールを収集しています。
- **現在、日本と韓国でこれらのツールを使用した経験がある人を探しています!!!!**
- 우리는 이미 전 세계에서 수집한 몇 가지 사용 사례와 도구들을 가지고 있습니다.
- **현재 일본과 한국에서 이러한 도구들을 사용한 경험이 있는 사람들을 찾고 있습니다！**.

## Questions we will ask
- English
- Have you used digital tools to improve civic participation before? e.g. collecting public opinion, hosting deliberative discussion.
- What kind of tools have you used?
- What is your consideration when you use digital tools?
- What kind of features or functions you want to have?
- Japanese
- 市民参加を向上させるためにデジタルツールを使用したことがありますか？ 例えば、世論を収集したり、討議を開催したりすることです。
- どのようなツールを使用しましたか？
- デジタルツールを使用する際に、どのような点を考慮しますか？
- どのような機能や特徴を求めますか？
- Korean
- 시민 참여를 향상시키기 위해 디지털 도구를 사용한 적이 있습니까? 예를 들어, 여론을 수집하거나 심의 토론을 개최하는 것과 같은 경우입니다.
- 어떤 도구를 사용했습니까?
- 디지털 도구를 사용할 때 어떤 점을 고려합니까?
- 어떤 기능이나 특징을 원합니까?

## 西尾泰和 Interview
- Have you used digital tools to improve civic participation before? e.g. collecting public opinion, hosting deliberative discussion.
- X api
- #TOKYOAI
https://note.com/nishiohirokazu/n/n0c7805faabca
- Talk to the City
- Google form
-匿名都政意見箱
- [persepctive API](https://perspectiveapi.com)
- https://perspectiveapi.com
- YouTube comment
- API
- 7000 comment for lokng live
- データの収集に関しては、当初GitHubとTwitterのハッシュタグを想定していた。
- YouTube動画へのコメントがたくさん来たのでそれを収集することも行った。
- また、匿名で意見を書きたい人やTwitterやYouTubeのアカウントがない人がいることが認識されたので、「誰も取り残さない」ために途中でGoogle Formを作成した。
- またYouTube上で動いて来るAI Annoにテキスト形式で質問を投稿できない人の手目に、Twilioを用いて電話での質問応答可能にした。
- What kind of tools have you used?
- What is your consideration when you use digital tools?
- accessibility
- everyone can use it
- X.com v.s. Youtube
- using phone call to collect opinion
- easy to collect data
- What kind of features or functions you want to have?
- 讓初心者也能簡單使用的功能？
- Open-source tools is good beause engineer can set up environment easily
- a proprietary tool easy to use and avaliable in a low cost would be preferable
- 例えば、Twitter、YouTube、GitHub、Google Formはオープンソースではないが、容易に使えるし、慣れているユーザも多い

For detail: [Digest of Anno team blog in 2024 Tokyo gubernatorial election｜NISHIO Hirokazu](https://note.com/nishiohirokazu/n/n0c7805faabca)

### Ohyeon Interview
- Have you used digital tools to improve civic participation before? e.g. collecting public opinion, hosting deliberative discussion.
- [Parti](https://parti.coop)
- social enterprise building citizen & open platforms for democracy, commons and public space for citizens in Korea
- 10 years, 26 crews, cover all issues with partnership
- not open source but open platform
- [english introduction](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-pJUNndU5h1rJgAUUihG5UreYjqodocD/view)
- [campaigns.do](https://campaigns.do/)
- citizen's action platform promoting their voices
- [demosx.org](https://demosx.org)
- citizen's collaboration platform for building a public space
- citizen participation platform of Seoul city government
- first we built open-source and open-guide, then becoming SasS for governance and collaboration.
- Korea's talk
- catergorizing users in spectrum
- talking event
- use opinion to match people
- two hours talk
- [datatrust.me](https://demosx.org)
- citizen's data pltform
- data activism of citizens - lots of data activities driven by citizen
- data commons for good made by nonprofit and citizens
- [mixon](https://mixon.io)
- 跟首爾市政府合作
- a solution for collaboration and governance.
- not open-source but Saas
- [townhall](https://townhall.kr)
- interactive polling and mass voting.
- like slido, but more korean-style collaboration (realtime, graphical effect, ... )
- user can add opinion
- used by citizen participation budget voting in local gov.
- not open-source
- What is your consideration when you use digital tools or develop the tools?
- development by themselves
- democracy tools need to be localized and culturally-considered
- ex. campaign.do: want to make everyone a star from galaxy
- Korea
- What kind of features or functions you want to have?
- a civic platform with more impact
- making people more aware of the civic tools
- safety issue:
- making people feel safe
- balance on making you say anything and not be offended

## 關治之
- decidim
- depends on how cities want to use, normally for collecting opinions of specific policies (ex: kids want to have a skate park, draft of small city policy) -> city will have a offical discussion (local level), organize by emails(easy for people to speak out)
- 15 local governments and private sectors
- workshops for university or high school students

other tools used: not used yet in cfj, want to share other solutions in japan
- polipoli (not open source)
- Liquid by [Liquitous](https://liquitous.com/) (civic participation platform)

When using digital tools, what's your main considerations?
- Open source (not necessary, but important)
- maybe small town can do it, and help improve the company product
- easier UI, actually dicidim has poor user interface, we are getting better
- usability, not only using internet, also need to arrange offline conversations, such as workshops
- need to reach out to important stakeholders, who may affect blockchain decision making

If you can develop a civil tech tool, what would you like to achieve?
- better API, beside website, the API can also connect to social media

- People can creative some policy proposal in EU, we want to gradually process to this stage

what is the process of the workshop?

- operate to the young generation
- also open to elder generation that don't have some many resource in this aspect

Do you share the same issue or proceed with the same way?

- When we share with students, we share the local case, more creative sharing
- When elder, we don't use many digital tools, rather use a big white paper. We then convert the information into digital tools.
- We do civil participation voluntarily, not paying

Is there any project proceed with the dicidim.
- [Report of the Decidim user meeting](https://www.code4japan.org/news/event-20240701-decidim)
- [Article about Decidim usecases in Japan. (Higashi-san is a project manager of the Decidim team in the CfJ)](https://note.com/kken78/n/n1a8ed4783595)
- [He has written many notes related to Decidim](https://note.com/kken78/m/m5710015edcd7)

Hal

The situation of workshop?

- Varys from region(mentioned a city)
- CfJ: 1 dedicate, 1 main contributor, 2 main developers